Skip to Content UTAS Home | Contacts
University of Tasmania Home Page School of Architecture

SETLs

 

Bachelor of Environmental Design

In response to student's SETL feedback, staff have detailed what improvements have been made to units.

KDA114 & KDA222 History & Theory in Design 1 & 4

Improvements made to units in response to SETL feed-back over the last 6 years

1. The student workload, particularly in terms of the number and the nature of  assignments, is reviewed every time these units are taught. Student workload has been reduced by cutting the number of assignments to three per unit, including the Visual Test, and combining together the class paper and essay assignments.

2. Assignments have also been restructured to ensure that they correlate more clearly with the unit’s Learning Outcomes, so that students understand more readily how their assignments fit into the bigger picture. This is enhanced by the revision of Unit outlines to clearly express the links between Generic Graduates Attributes, Learning Outcomes for the unit, and assessment tasks for the unit.

3. Lectures have been converted from 35mm slide basis to PowerPoint. This means that:

  • More verbal data as well as graphic data can be presented visually [of particular assistance to ESL students]

  • Lecture presentations can be made available to students [in pdf format] via the School server, and therefore:

    • Students who miss lectures [through illness or timetable clashes] can see the visual presentation

    • Students [particularly who do not have English as a first language] can review the lecture presentation in their own time

    • Students  have ready access to the graphic material upon which the end-of-semester Visual Test is based.

4. All material presented to students is made available to them in pdf format via the School server.  This material includes not only the unit outline and reading lists, but also lecture presentations [see above], lecture handouts, detailed assignment directions, exercises undertaken in class, and, where appropriate, model responses to assignments. This means that:

  • Students who miss classes [through illness or timetable clashes] can readily access all materials issued

  • Students can review class exercises in their own time

  • Students can, where appropriate, refer to model responses in the preparation of their own work.

5. In HTD 1, each lecture concludes with a section entitled ‘Why is this relevant today?’. This reiterates the key architectural design concepts introduced and/or developed by the architecture covered in that lecture, and demonstrates the influence of that lecture’s architecture on later architectural developments, through to the present day.

KDA223 Building Technology in Design 4

Effective integration of Design and Building Technology subjects has been recognised as a practical and effective ways of increasing the quality of the technical component of student's building design. Several teaching strategies were trialled with student SETL responses being used to measure their effectiveness. As a result of this feedback, processes increasing effective integration have been adopted in many of the BTD subjects in first degree.

KDA212 History & Theory in Design 3

1. In 2005, in response to student comments that the HTD3 workload was too high, one task assessment was deleted, leaving three assignments and one slide test.

2. In 2006, in response to student requests for access to PowerPoint presentations, PDFs of the presentations were made available to students via the School of Architecture Resources Folder.

KDA211 Design Studio 3

1. In response to students commenting that they like having two different design projects in DS3, this structure has been maintained rather than changing to the format of most DS units, i.e. just one design project across the whole of each semester.

2. In 2005, in response to the student question, "Can you tell me how to become a better designer', a lecture on Design Processes was introduced.

3. In 2006, in response to student dissatisfaction over group marks for a group assignment, a system was devised whereby the group assignment involves a combination of both individually assessed tasks and group assessed tasks, with the majority of the marks being allocated to the individually assessed component.